Collaborative Case Terminations: The Case for the Final Meeting

When a collaborative case terminates, the transition to a binding process doesn’t have to be adversarial or chaotic. With thoughtful planning and clear communication, collaborative professionals can provide their clients ways to move forward with dignity while protecting work they’ve accomplished during the Collaborative Law process.

The Final Meeting: Your Most Important Tool

Ideally, hold a final meeting with both clients present to collectively determine what information and documents will be shared with incoming litigation attorneys. This meeting serves multiple purposes: it maintains the collaborative spirit of transparency, ensures both clients have agency in the transition, and prevents misunderstandings about what is protected by the Participation Agreement and what can be shared with the litigation attorneys.

Collaborative attorney Sara Wahl ensures that from the beginning of every collaborative case, the expectation is that if the case terminates, a final meeting will be held to make these decisions together. “This early framing is critical—it removes surprise and positions termination not as failure, but as a transition to the next phase of their legal process.”

Essential Elements of a Termination Letter

The primary purpose of a termination letter is to bring the newly hired litigation attorneys up to speed quickly, to inform them about agreements made in the Collaborative Law process, and to eliminate redundant work. Clients have already invested in the Collaborative Law process—there should be no reason for them to start from scratch with new counsel. By sharing agreed work products, documents, and context, you help the incoming attorneys hit the ground running, saving your clients both time and money.

A well-crafted termination letter accomplishes three goals: it provides practical support by sharing agreed work product created in the Collaborative Law process; it protects privilege by clearly delineating for future counsel what cannot be used as evidence; and it maintains client dignity by documenting agreements the clients have reached about their transition period.

The sample letter below, which Dominik Musafia has used, was originally drafted by Kevin Scudder; it demonstrates these principles in action. Notice how it:

  • Clearly identifies shared documents while explaining which are templates, not evidence of agreement
  • Explicitly invokes privilege protections (ER 408 and RCW 7.77)
  • Documents interim agreements the clients reached for the transition period
  • Reminds attorneys of Collaborative Law constraints (neutrals cannot testify)
  • Sets boundaries around property and financial arrangements during transition
  • Maintains a professional, respectful tone that honors the clients’ collaborative work


Optional Items to Consider Including

Depending on your case, you may also want to address:

  • Communication protocols the clients have established (apps, email rules, etc.)
  • Agreements about children’s activities, schools, or healthcare during transition
  • Pet care arrangements if relevant
  • Information about pending matters (refinancing, home sales, etc.)
  • Other pertinent case-specific information

Moving Forward with Grace

The truncated end of a Collaborative Law case does not need to be a “failure”—it can be recognition that clients need a different process involving a decision-maker to resolve their remaining issues. By conducting a thoughtful final meeting and providing a comprehensive transition letter, we honor the work done in the Collaborative Law process and set our clients up for greater success and reduced fees in the next phase of their divorce.

Similar Posts